Il caso Tartaglia consente nuova definizione di “psichiatria”

 

Prendo spunto dalla notizia odierna (vedi articolo sotto) sul fatto che Tartaglia, colui che tirò una statuetta del Duomo di Milano in faccia a Berlusconi, sia stato giudicato non imputabile e riassegnato alle amorevoli cure degli psichiatri.

La vecchia definizione di psichiatria che io utilizzavo era:

“Quella pseudo scienza per la quale, se qualsiasi persona di buon senso raccomanda di non infilare le dita nella presa della corrente, ciononostante essa invece asserisce che faccia bene infilarci il cervello”.

Sebbene la suddetta definizione sia ancora attuale (l’elettroshock è ancora una “terapia” raccomandata e praticata in molti istituti psichiatrici – vero, Dr. Cassano?) le cronache attuali mi inducono a formulare un’altra definizione in aggiunta alla precedente.

Nuova definizione di psichiatria:

“Quella pseudo scienza per la quale, dopo aver curato per 4 anni anni una persona, come risultato si ottiene che quella persona commetta un attentato contro il principale rappresentante del proprio governo, senza che la persona venga considerata responsabile delle proprie azioni e tantomeno chi l’ha ‘curata’.”

C’è ancora gente che da retta a questi pseudo scienziati. Si pensi che ad una puntata di Anno Zero poco dopo l’attentato a Berlusconi, Sant’Oro [apostrofo voluto] invitò un’eminenza del pensiero psic(anal)itico [parentesi volute] come Galimberti il quale sentenziò (evidentemente anticipando la sentenza di oggi) che il vero responsabile dell’attento a Berlusconi è… Berlusconi stesso, a causa della sua personalità carismatica che attira le reazioni dei fanatici.

Ma vè in mona, va’!

________________

Da: TGCom.it

29/06/2010

Milano, assolto Massimo Tartaglia

Aggredì Berlusconi, "non imputabile"

 

Massimo Tartaglia, l’uomo che lo scorso 13 dicembre aggredì Silvio Berlusconi in piazza Duomo, è stato assolto dal gup di Milano nel processo con rito abbreviato perché non imputabile. Accettate quindi le richieste della procura di Milano.

Il pm Armando Spataro aveva chiesto al gup il proscioglimento del 42enne di Cesano Boscone. "Tartaglia non può essere imputabile", ha detto Spataro durante il processo con rito abbreviato. Il giudice inoltre ha disposto la misura della sicurezza della liberta’ vigilata per un anno, con la permanenza nella comunità terapeutica dove ora si trova, periodo nel quale Tartaglia dovrà seguire le regole e le prescrizioni del direttore della comunità e il divieto di partecipare a manifestazioni pubbliche per un anno.

Soddisfazione è stata manifestata dai difensori di Tartaglia, gli avvocati Daniela Insalaco e Gian Marco Rubino, i quali hanno sostenuto di aver detto fin dall’inizio che il loro assistito andava curato. ”L’esigenza principale era quella di cura – hanno detto – a cui doveva essere data la priorità assoluta”.

Fonte: http://www.tgcom.mediaset.it/cronaca/articoli/articolo485193.shtml

Prediligere cibi naturali viene ora definito come disturbo mentale

 

Choosing healthy foods now called a mental disorder

Tuesday, June 29, 2010
by Mike Adams, the Health Ranger
Editor of NaturalNews.com

(NaturalNews) In its never-ending attempt to fabricate "mental disorders" out of every human activity, the psychiatric industry is now pushing the most ridiculous disease they’ve invented yet: Healthy eating disorder.
This is no joke: If you focus on eating healthy foods, you’re "mentally diseased" and probably need some sort of chemical treatment involving powerful psychotropic drugs. The Guardiannewspaper reports, "Fixation with healthy eating can be sign of serious psychological disorder" and goes on to claim this "disease" is called orthorexia nervosa — which is basically just Latin for "nervous about correct eating."
But they can’t just called it "nervous healthy eating disorder" because that doesn’t sound like they know what they’re talking about. So they translate it into Latin where it sounds smart (even though it isn’t). That’s where most disease names come from: Doctors just describe the symptoms they see with a name like osteoporosis (which means "bones with holes in them").
Getting back to this fabricated "orthorexia" disease, the Guardian goes on to report, "Orthorexics commonly have rigid rules around eating. Refusing to touch sugar, salt, caffeine, alcohol, wheat, gluten, yeast, soya, corn and dairy foods is just the start of their diet restrictions. Any foods that have come into contact with pesticides, herbicides or contain artificial additives are also out."
Wait a second. So attempting to avoid chemicals, dairy, soy and sugar now makes you a mental health patient? Yep. According to these experts. If you actually take special care to avoid pesticides, herbicides and genetically modified ingredients like soy and sugar, there’s something wrong with you.
But did you notice that eating junk food is assumed to be "normal?" If you eat processed junk foods laced with synthetic chemicals, that’s okay with them. The mental patients are the ones who choose organic, natural foods, apparently.

What is "normal" when it comes to foods?

I told you this was coming. Years ago, I warned NaturalNews readers that an attempt might soon be under way to outlaw broccoli because of its anti-cancer phytonutrients. This mental health assault on health-conscious consumers is part of that agenda. It’s an effort tomarginalize healthy eaters by declaring them to be mentally unstable and therefore justify carting them off to mental institutions where they will be injected with psychiatric drugs and fed institutional food that’s all processed, dead and full of toxic chemicals.
The Guardian even goes to the ridiculous extreme of saying, "The obsession about which foods are "good" and which are "bad" means orthorexics can end up malnourished."
Follow the non-logic on this, if you can: Eating "good" foods will cause malnutrition! Eating bad foods, I suppose, is assumed to provide all the nutrients you need. That’s about as crazy a statement on nutrition as I’ve ever read. No wonder people are so diseased today: The mainstream media is telling them that eating health food is a mental disorder that will cause malnutrition!

Shut up and swallow your Soylent Green

It’s just like I reported years ago: You’re not supposed to question your food, folks. Sit down, shut up, dig in and chow down. Stop thinking about what you’re eating and just do what you’re told by the mainstream media and its processed food advertisers. Questioning the health properties of your junk food is a mental disorder, didn’t you know? And if you "obsess" over foods (by doing such things as reading the ingredients labels, for example), then you’re weird. Maybe even sick.
That’s the message they’re broadcasting now. Junk food eaters are "normal" and "sane" and "nourished." But health food eaters are diseased, abnormal and malnourished.
But why, you ask, would they attack healthy eaters? People like Dr. Gabriel Cousens can tell you why: Because increased mental and spiritual awareness is only possible while on a diet of living, natural foods.
Eating junk foods keeps you dumbed down and easy to control, you see. It literally messes with your mind, numbing your senses with MSG, aspartame and yeast extract. People who subsist on junk foods are docile and quickly lose the ability to think for themselves. They go along with whatever they’re told by the TV or those in apparent positions of authority, never questioning their actions or what’s really happening in the world around them.
In contrast to that, people who eat health-enhancing natural foods — with all the medicinal nutrients still intact — begin to awaken their minds and spirits. Over time, they begin to question the reality around them and they pursue more enlightened explorations of topics like community, nature, ethics, philosophy and the big picture of things that are happening in the world. They become "aware" and can start to see the very fabric of the Matrix, so to speak.
This, of course, is a huge danger to those who run our consumption-based society becauseconsumption depends on ignorance combined with suggestibility. For people to keep blindly buying foods, medicines, health insurance and consumer goods, they need to have their higher brain functions switched off. Processed junk foods laced with toxic chemicals just happens to achieve that rather nicely. Why do you think dead, processed foods remain the default meals in public schools, hospitals and prisons? It’s because dead foods turn off higher levels of awareness and keep people focused on whatever distractions you can feed their brains: Television, violence, fear, sports, sex and so on.
But living as a zombie is, in one way quite "normal" in society today because so many people are doing it. But that doesn’t make it normal in my book: The real "normal" is an empowered, healthy, awakened person nourished with living foods and operating as a sovereign citizen in a free world. Eating living foods is like taking the red pill because over time it opens up a whole new perspective on the fabric of reality. It sets you free to think for yourself.
But eating processed junk foods is like taking the blue pill because it keeps you trapped in a fabricated reality where your life experiences are fabricated by consumer product companies who hijack your senses with designer chemicals (like MSG) that fool your brain into thinking you’re eating real food.
If you want to be alive, aware and in control of your own life, eat more healthy living foods. But don’t expect to be popular with mainstream mental health "experts" or dieticians — they’re all being programmed to consider you to be "crazy" because you don’t follow their mainstream diets of dead foods laced with synthetic chemicals.
But you and I know the truth here: We are the normal ones. The junk food eaters are the real mental patients, and the only way to wake them up to the real world is to start feeding them living foods.
Some people are ready to take the red pill, and others aren’t. All you can do is show them the door. They must open it themselves.
In the mean time, try to avoid the mental health agents who are trying to label you as having a mental disorder just because you pay attention to what you put in your body. There’s nothing wrong with avoiding sugar, soy, MSG, aspartame, HFCS and other toxic chemicals in the food supply. In fact, your very life depends on it.
Oh, and by the way, if you want to join the health experts who keep inventing new fictitious diseases and disorders, check out my popular Disease Mongering Engine web page where you can invent your own new diseases at the click of a button! You’ll find it at:http://www.naturalnews.com/disease-…
Sources for this story include:
http://www.guardian.co.uk/society/2…

La credibilità dell’OMS precipita come l’aereo del governo polacco

 

PENSIERI IN-BARAZZATI

Pandemia della SARS.
Pandemia dell’influenza aviaria.
Pandemia dell’influenza suina.

Tre casi eclatanti degli ultimi anni che traggono origine dalle stime di diffusione dell’Organizzazione Mondiale della Sanità.
Le raccomandazioni dell’OMS (VINCOLANTI per i governi che vi aderiscono) hanno contribuito a diffondere uno stato di emergenza mondiale con il quale i media sono andati a nozze bombardandoci ogni giorno di notizie catastrofiche riguardanti il nostro futuro prossimo venturo.
Quanto più i media sono stati solerti a riempirci di notizie catastrofiche sulla diffusione delle pandemie, tanto meno hanno parlato dopo (un silenzio assordante) sulle reali conseguenze di queste pandemie.

Qualche dato:

morti annuali nel mondo per tubercolosi – 1.380.000
morti annuali nel mondo per influenza stagionale – 150.000
morti per influenza suina – 15.000

possibili morti stimate dall’OMS per l’influenza aviaria – 17.000.000

morti accertate – 246

vaccini comperati dal solo governo italiano 25.000.000 – usati meno di un milione
vaccini comperati dal solo governo francese 98.000.000 (più della sua stessa popolazione!) – usati 5 milioni

l’unico governo che si è rifiutato di seguire le raccomandazioni dell’OMS e che anzi ha denunciato l’assurdità delle stime fornite nonché delle raccomandazioni (il governo polacco) , sappiamo tutti che fine ha fatto…

Ora, chi sono questi dell’OMS che "ordinano" ai governi di comperare milioni di vaccini in base a delle stime che si rivelano assolutamente inattendibili?
O sono degli emeriti incompetenti o sono dei criminali!
Nel primo caso, perché sono ancora al loro posto? Perché non gli addebitano gli enormi costi sociali sostenuti dai governi per l’acquisto dei vaccini e per i danni dovuti agli effetti collaterali?
Nel secondo caso, perché non li processano per procurato allarme, per truffa o addirittura per crimini contro l’umanità?
Chi sono questi dell’OMS? Non sono eletti dal popolo, quindi chi ha dato loro l’autorità di poter imporre le loro raccomandazioni ai governi? Chi li ha messi sullo scranno del potere? Chi c’è veramente dietro?

Ne ha ammazzati quasi di più la caduta dell’areo che trasportava il governo polacco che tutta la pandemia mondiale dell’influenza aviaria…

Hai abbastanza talento per avere successo? – Do You Have Enough Talent to Succeed?

---

Do You Have Enough Talent to Succeed?

To explain their failures, you might hear people say,

"I don’t have a head for business which is why my scrapbook store went bankrupt."

"Leaders are born to lead. I was born to follow. I’ll just be a good soldier."

"She inherited her musical skill from her father, but my dad is a truck driver which is why I can’t play the piano."

If you believe you need to inherit a skill or talent to be successful, you are one step closer to failure. Yet if you realize you can get the talent to succeed at anything you wish, you are one step closer to success. So if talent is not something you are born with, where do you get it?

How did Michael Jordan become the greatest basketball player of all time? What made Luciano Pavarotti into a great opera singer? Why was Warren Buffet such a brilliant investor?

Are these professionals born with their skills?

Actually, the most successful athletes, musicians, investors, actors, managers and doctors do not get their skills at birth. They achieve their greatness through hard, intense practice.

"In any activity, quite a bit of what passes for ‘talent’ is really just practice."

"One can train one’s body, one’s eyes, one’s hands and feet until, with practice, they sort of ‘get to know.’ One no longer has to ‘think’ to set up the stove or park the car: one just DOES it."

"The same principle applies to crafts and professions which mainly use the mind. The lawyer who has not drilled, drilled, drilled on courtroom procedure may not have learned to shift his mental gears fast enough to counter new turns of a case and loses it. An undrilled new stockbroker could lose a fortune in minutes. A green salesman who has not rehearsed selling can starve for lack of sales.

"The right answer is to practice, practice and practice!" — L. Ron Hubbard from The Way to Happiness

Examples:

Warren Buffett spent hours, every day for many years, studying financial statements of potential investments.

Winston Churchill, one of the world’s greatest speakers, practiced his speeches compulsively.

Michael Jordan was cut from his high school team which proves his talent was not natural. Instead, he practiced his famous basketball moves for more hours every day than anyone else in the game.

The best musicians, writers, actors, surgeons, managers, computer programmers, artists, politicians, dentists, chefs, pilots and electricians all become the best through hours and hours and hours of practice. And their practice is intense.

For example, hitting a bucket of golf balls for fun is not practice, which is why most golfers don’t improve. Practice means you hit 300 balls, with the same club, with the goal of leaving the ball within 20 feet of the same spot. And you do this every day.

For a musician, practice means you play the same piece of music 1000 times, each time better than the last, until you can make people cry during a performance.

For an artist, practice means you paint the same flower 300 times until people gasp when they look at it.

For a writer, practice means you re-write the same story 100 times until your readers can’t put it down.

Role-playing or drilling is how you practice to become a great lawyer, a great doctor or a great speaker. Much of this practice can be done with a coach, as well as on the job.

To succeed as a manager, you need to spend many hours bringing out the best performance possible from each of your employees. For example, sales managers should practice with their sales people. "I’ll pretend I’m afraid to buy a new car and you sell it to me anyway. Here we go. ‘Oh, I’m just too nervous to buy this car . . . .’" The more practicing the sales managers conduct, the more cars they sell.

Every skill can be practiced and improved: negotiating business deals, explaining financial statements, giving speeches, driving race cars, using computers, writing reports, teaching students, managing money, fixing engines, building houses, everything.

No one is born with talent. Yet with practice, everyone, including you, can become talented at anything!

Recommendations

1. Write down a talent you wish to gain.

2. Break down the talent into all of its skills. Make a thorough list.

For example, to be a great soccer player, you need to master 50 different types of kicks. To be a great accountant, you need to master math, financial laws and accounting software as well as many people skills. You might have a list of 100 individual skills.

3. Work out how to practice each individual skill. Some skills you can practice on your own while others require study or research or a coach to help you master the skill.

4. Practice for as many hours as you can stand, each day, until each skill is perfect and you gain the talent you desire. If you get work done while you practice a skill, even better!

5. Every time you fail at something, look at it as mere practice. Turn the loss into an opportunity. Which of your skills need more work?

6. Constantly improve your skills. Everyone has room for improvement.

As a result of your constant improvement, you will gain all the skills and talent you need to succeed.

---

Provided by TipsForSuccess.org as a public service to introduce the technology of L. Ron Hubbard to you.

Copyright © 2010 TipsForSuccess.org. All rights reserved. Grateful acknowledgment is made to L. Ron Hubbard Library for permission to reproduce selections from the copyrighted works of L. Ron Hubbard.

To subscribe, buy books, contact us or learn more about TipsForSuccess.org, click here.

For permission to copy, print or post this article, go to http://www.tipsforsuccess.org/reprint_info.htm or click here.

Take better control of your life with the TipsForSuccess coaching website at http://www.tipsforsuccesscoaching.org. or click here.

 

TipsForSuccess.org | 615 South Highway 49 | Jackson | CA | 95642

Cosa fare quando ti senti offeso – What to do when you feel outraged

---

What to Do When You Feel Outraged

Getting angry is the correct response in some situations. Yet blowing up and overreacting can ruin your relationships and success.

For example, you might feel outraged and say:

1. "WHO STOLE MY PEN!"

2. "I can’t believe you got home late again; I just can’t trust you."

3. "I hear you changed your mind! After all my hard work. I can’t believe this!"

4. "She never called me back so I guess she is rejecting my offer. I’m never working with her again!"

5. "He always disagrees with me and I’ve had it!"

Jumping to the wrong conclusion and getting outraged can seriously damage your success.

Great Advice for Handling Anger

"Listen and question before you decide you’re outraged." — L. Ron Hubbard

By listening and questioning, you find the correct problem and see a better solution.

1. "Has anyone seen my pen?"

2. "Why did you get home late?"

3. "Did you change your mind?"

4. "Will you accept my offer?"

5. "Do you disagree with me?"

By listening and questioning, you learn the truth.

1. "Oh sure, you can borrow it."

2. "Sorry; I forgot you’d told me you’d be late!"

3. "I’m glad you did not change your mind."

4. "Take all the time you need to think about my offer."

5. "I’m glad we agree!"

In most cases, you will not feel outraged after you listen and question.

Recommendation

The next time you feel outraged, do not react.

Instead, ask a few questions and listen to the answers.

Much of the time you’ll find you reached the wrong conclusion.

You’ll be happy you did not react!

---

Provided by TipsForSuccess.org as a public service to introduce the technology of L. Ron Hubbard to you.

Copyright © 2010 TipsForSuccess.org. All rights reserved. Grateful acknowledgment is made to L. Ron Hubbard Library for permission to reproduce selections from the copyrighted works of L. Ron Hubbard.

To subscribe, buy books, contact us or learn more about TipsForSuccess.org, click here.

For permission to copy, print or post this article, go to http://www.tipsforsuccess.org/reprint_info.htm or click here.

Take better control of your life with the TipsForSuccess coaching website at http://www.tipsforsuccesscoaching.org. or click here.

TipsForSuccess.org | 615 South Highway 49 | Jackson | CA | 95642

La sagra della psichiatria

 

PENSIERI IN-BARAZZATI

Ieri mattina, mentre andavo a lavorare, alla radio trasmettevano il GR1.

Più che una notizia ho sentito uno spot pubblicitario sulla depressione.

Con tanto di patrocinio del Ministero delle Pari Opportunità, in un convegno da qualche parte a Roma si sta "festeggiando" il fatto che la depressione diventerà tra pochi anni la seconda fonte di invalidità in assoluto!

Mi immagino i tappeti rossi come sulla croisette dove fanno la passerella i lobbisti di Big Pharma che rilasciano interviste sfoggiando un sorriso accattivante e snocciolando statistiche che, a pensarci bene, fanno accapponare la pelle ma che in realtà sembrano voler dire: "Non abbiate timore. Non è perché avete perso il figlio o il lavoro che siete depressi. E’ perché avete contratto una malattia che è sempre più diffusa. Ormai è normale soffrire di depressione. Rivolgetevi al vostro psichiatra di fiducia il quale vi consiglierà sul modo migliore per curarvi!".

La giornalista del GR1 che intervistava l’eminente psichiatra chiedeva: "Perché la gente non si fida degli psicofarmaci?".
La risposta dell’esperto non è stata, ovviamente, "perché non hanno mai guarito nessuno ed anzi è una delle cause principali di suicidio e episodi di violenza efferata e insensata".
La risposta è stata che le persone sono convinte che queste sostanze agiscano sul cervello (e dove agiscono invece, sullo spirito?) ma che sono solo una delle possibili cure usate dagli psichiatri; che in realtà le droghe psichiatriche vengono usate solo dopo che nessun altro metodo alternativo abbia funzionato (metodi alternativi della psichiatria? Come l’internamento coatto, l’elettroshock, la lobotomia?) e che solo non vergognandosi della propria "malattia" e cercando il loro aiuto si può sperare di "guarire".

Peccato che nella realtà e in altre sedi gli psichiatri stessi ammettano di non poter veramente guarire e di non aver mai guarito nessuno perché non sono nemmeno in grado di dimostrare che le cosiddette malattie mentali abbiano un’origine biologica.
Peccato che l’assunzione di psicofarmaci non curi la perdita del figlio o del lavoro ma semplicemente anestetizzi la persona alla vita.
Peccato che non sia vero che il ricorso agli psicofarmaci sia l’estremo tentativo dopo che tutte le possibili alternative siano state provate.
Peccato che in America (ma probabilmente anche in Italia) se entri in uno studio psichiatrico hai ben oltre il 90% di possibilità di uscire con una prescrizione farmaceutica (anche se sei un bambino in età scolare!).
Peccato che per diagnosticare una malattia psichiatrica non serva nessuna visita o esame o controllo ma sia sufficiente una semplice intervista e la diagnosi avvenga in base a delle semplici risposte.

Di quanti peccati si deve ancora macchiare la psichiatria prima che il buon senso prevalga e questa truffa organizzata venga fermata?